|
About Uranium
Nuclear Power: Plans for New Reactors
Today there are some 440 nuclear power reactors in 31 countries, with a combined capacity
of over 364 GWe. In 2003 these provided 2525 billion kWh, over 16% of the world's electricity.
About 30 power reactors are currently being constructed in 11 countries (see Table below),
notably China, the Republic of Korea, Japan and Russia. Construction is well-advanced on
many of them.
Despite this growth, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) forecasts that the total
installed nuclear capacity in 2015 will be little more than that in 2000, - 370 GWe, with
the nuclear share of world electricity output decreased from 17% in 1997 to 13% in 2015.
Increased Capacity
Increased
nuclear capacity in some countries is resulting from the uprating
of existing plants. This is a highly cost-effective way of bringing on new
capacity.
Numerous
power reactors in USA, Belgium, Sweden and Germany, for example,
have had their generating capacity increased. In Switzerland,
the capacity of its five reactors has been increased by 12.3%. In the
USA the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved 96 uprates since 1977, a few of them "extended uprates" of up to 20%.
Spain
has a program to add 810 MWe (11%) to its nuclear
capacity through upgrading its nine reactors by up to 13%. For instance, the Almarez nuclear plant is being boosted by more than 5% at a
cost of US$ 50 million. Some 519 MWe of the increase
is already in place.
Finland
has recently boosted the capacity of the Olkiluoto plant by 23% to 1680 MWe.
This plant started with two 660 MWe Swedish BWRs commissioned in 1978 and 1980. It is now licensed to
operate to 2018. The Loviisa plant, with two VVER-440
(PWR) reactors, has been uprated by almost 100 MWe (11%).
Nuclear Plant Construction
Most
reactors currently planned are in the Asian region, with fast-growing economies
and rapidly-rising electricity demand.
At
least eight countries with existing nuclear power programs (Finland, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Japan and South Korea) have plans to
build new power reactors (beyond those now under construction). In addition,
there is a program - now stalled - to provide North Korea with two South
Korean 1000 MWe PWRs. Of
countries without any present nuclear capacity, Iran has construction
well advanced on its first unit.
In
all, some 35 power reactors with a total net capacity of about 37,000 MWe are planned and a similar number are proposed. Rising
gas prices and greenhouse constraints on coal have combined to put nuclear
power back on the agenda for projected new capacity in both Europe and North America.
In
Finland, the government has decided to
proceed with construction of a fifth reactor, this has
been approved by parliament.
In
Russia, there are five reactors under
construction and due for completion by 2010. Five further reactors are then
planned to replace some existing plants, and 19 further reactors are planned to
add new capacity by 2020. This will increase the country's
present 20.8 GWe nuclear power capacity to 50 GWe about 2020. In addition about 5 GW of nuclear
thermal capacity is planned.
In
Ukraine, Khmelnitsky-2 was connected to
the grid in August 2004 and Rovno-4 is expected to do so in September. These
will replace lost output from Chernobyl.
Nuclear
power will continue to play a major role in the future electricity supply mix in both South Korea and Japan.
In
addition to the reactor under construction, South
Korea plans to bring a further eight, giving total new capacity
of 11,100 MWe, into operation by the year 2015. Ulchin 6, a 1000 MWe Korean
Standard Nuclear Plants (KSNP), is due for completion in 2005 and unit 5 was
connected to the grid in 2004. Following them are planned Shin-Kori-1 & 2
and Wolsong-5 & 6, to be improved KSNP designs. Then come Shin-Kori-3 &
4, the first of the Advanced PWRs of 1400 MWe, and two more near Ulchin.
These APR-1400 designs have evolved from the US System 80+ which has US NRC
design certification, and have been known as the Korean Next-Generation
Reactor. Cost is expected to be US$ 1400 per kilowatt, falling to $1200/kW in
later units with 48 month construction time.
Japan
has three reactors under construction. It also has plans and, in most cases,
designated sites and announced timetables for a further 12 power reactors, totalling over 14,000 MWe, and
some of these are undergoing governmental approval. Early in 2001 the major
utility Tepco deferred plans for 12 major fossil fuel
plants but maintained its schedule for four new nuclear plants.
In
China, now with nine operating reactors
on the mainland, CNNC is well into the next phase of its nuclear power program.
Four new reactors started up in 2002, and two more 2003-04. Construction is
advanced on two Russian 950 MWe PWRs
at Jiangsu Tianwan in Lianyungang. These are
expected to start up by 2006, and will to add some 2535 MWe
to the present 6587 MWe mainland nuclear capacity.
China NNC plans to build eight large new reactors as soon as possible at Lingdong, Qinshan, Sanmen and Yangjiang. It aims to
quadruple its nuclear capacity from that operating and under construction by
2020. On Taiwan, Taipower is bujilding two
advanced BWRs at Lungmen.
India
has nine reactors under construction and expected to be completed by 2010. This
includes two large Russian reactors and a large prototype fast breeder reactor
as part of its strategy to develop a fuel cycle which can utilise
thorium.
Pakistan
has signed a contract with China
for a second 300 MWe reactor at Chasma,
financed by China.
Nuclear
power plant construction in Iran was suspended in
1979 but in 1995 Iran signed an
agreement with Russia to complete a
1000 MWe PWR at Bushehr.
Construction is well advanced and a further unit is planned.
Indonesia
has completed the feasibility study for its first 1800 MWe
nuclear power station This was deferred indefinitely
but has lately been revived. Vietnam
is also considering its first nuclear power venture.
Egypt
and Turkey
have for decades included a nuclear power plant in their electricity plans. A
site has been selected in each country and a number of feasibility and other
studies carried out. Turkey
however has indefinitely deferred its first plant.
Plant Life Extension
Most
nuclear power plants originally had a nominal design lifetime of up to 40
years, but engineering assessments of many plants over the last decade has
established that many can operate longer. In the
USA more than 15 reactors have been granted licence
renewals which extend their operating lives from the original 40 out to 60
years, and operators of most others are expected to apply for similar
extensions. In Japan, plant lifetimes
up to 70 years re envisaged.
When
the oldest commercial nuclear power stations in the world, Calder Hall and Chapelcross in the UK, were built in
the 1950s they were very conservatively engineered, though it was assumed that
they would have a useful lifetime of only 20-25 years. They were then authorised to operate for 50 years but due to economic
factors are closing earlier. Most other Magnox plants
are licensed for 40-year lifetimes.
The
Russian government in 2000 extended the operating lives of the country's 12
oldest reactors from their original 30 years, and recently the extension was
quantified as 15 years.
The
technical and economic feasibility of replacing major reactor components, such
as steam generators in PWRs and pressure tubes in
CANDU heavy water reactors, has been demonstrated. The possibilities of
component replacement and licence renewals extending
the lifetimes of existing plants are very attractive to utilities, especially
in view of the public acceptance difficulties involved in constructing
replacement nuclear capacity.
On
the other hand, economic, regulatory and political considerations have led to
the premature closure of some power reactors, particularly in the United States, where reactor
numbers have fallen from 110 to 103.
Power Reactors Under Construction
| Start Operation* |
Organisation |
REACTOR |
TYPE |
MWe
(net) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
Ukraine, Energoatom |
Khmelnitski 2 |
PWR |
950 - started |
| 2004 |
Ukraine, Energoatom |
Rovno 4 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2004 |
Russia, Rosenergoatom |
Kalinin 3 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2004 |
China,
CNNC |
Tianwan 1 |
PWR |
950 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2005 |
South Korea,
KHNP |
Ulchin 6 |
PWR (KSNP) |
950 |
| 2005 |
Japan, Tohoku |
Higashidori 1 (Tohoku) |
BWR |
1067 |
| 2005 |
China,
CNNC |
Tianwan 2 |
PWR |
950 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2006 |
Iran, AEOI |
Bushehr 1 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2006 |
Japan, Hokuriku |
Shika-2 |
ABWR |
1315 |
| 2006 |
India, NPCIL |
Tarapur 4 |
PHWR |
490 |
| 2006 |
China, Taipower |
Lungmen 1 |
ABWR |
1300 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2007 |
India, NPCIL |
Tarapur 3 |
PHWR |
490 |
| 2007 |
India, NPCIL |
Rawatbhata 5 |
PHWR |
202 |
| 2007 |
Romania, SNN |
Cernavoda 2 |
PHWR |
650 |
| 2007 |
India, NPCIL |
Kudankulam 1 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2007 |
India, NPCIL |
Kaiga 3 |
PHWR |
202 |
| 2007 |
India, NPCIL |
Kaiga 4 |
PHWR |
202 |
| 2007 |
USA, TVA |
Browns Ferry 1 |
BWR |
1065 |
| 2007 |
China, Taipower |
Lungmen 2 |
ABWR |
1300 |
| 2007 |
Russia, Rosenergoatom |
Volgodonsk-2 |
PWR |
950 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2008 |
India, NPCIL |
Kudankulam 2 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2008 |
India, NPCIL |
Rawatbhata 6 |
PHWR |
202 |
| 2008 |
Russia, Rosenergoatom |
Balakovo 5 |
PWR |
950 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2009 |
Russia, Rosenergoatom |
Beloyarsk 4 |
FBR |
750 |
| 2010 |
Japan, Hokkaido |
Tomari 3 |
PWR |
912 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2010 |
Russia, Rosenergoatom |
Balakovo 6 |
PWR |
950 |
| 2010 |
India, NPCIL |
Kalpakkam |
FBR |
440 |
| 2010 |
Pakistan, PAEC |
Chashma 2 |
PWR |
300 |
| 2010?? |
North Korea, KEDO |
Sinpo 1 |
PWR (KSNP) |
950 |
* Latest announced year of proposed
commercial operation.
The
World Nuclear Power Reactor table gives a
fuller and (for current year) possibly more up to date overview of world
reactor status.
Some Power Reactors Planned Or On Order
| start operation |
start construction |
|
Reactor |
Type |
MWe (each) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2008 |
resumed |
Argentina, CNEA |
Atucha 2 |
PHWR |
692 |
| 2009 |
2005 |
Finland, TVO |
Olkiluoto-3 |
PWR |
1600 |
| 2010-11 |
2005 |
Japan, Tepco |
Fuikishima 7 8 |
PWR |
1325 |
| 2008-9 |
2004? |
S Korea, KHNP |
Shin-Kori 1 & 2 |
PWR (KSNP+) |
950 |
| 2009-10 |
2004? |
S Korea, KHNP |
Shin-Wolsong 5 & 6 |
PWR (KSNP+) |
950 |
| 2014-15 |
2007 |
Japan, JAPC |
Tsuruga 3 4 |
APWR |
1500 |
| 2011 |
2005 |
Japan, Chugoku |
Shimane 3 |
ABWR |
1375 |
| 2010-11 |
2005? |
S Korea, KHNP |
Shin-Kori 3 & 4 |
APR (KNGR) |
1350 |
| 2012 |
2006 |
Japan, EPDC |
Ohma |
ABWR |
1350 |
| 2012? |
2005 |
Japan, Tepco |
Higashidori 1-2 (Tepco) |
ABWR |
1320 |
| 2012+ |
2007 |
Japan, Tohoku |
Higashidori 2 (Tohoku) |
ABWR |
1320 |
| 2012 |
2006? |
China,
CNNC |
Lingdong 1 2 |
PWR |
1000 |
| 2012 |
2006? |
China, CNNC |
Sanmen 1 2 |
PWR |
1000 |
| 2015 |
|
S Korea, KHNP |
near Ulchin x2 |
APR (KNGR) |
1350 |
| |
|
India, NPCIL |
Rawatbhata 7 & 8 |
PHWR |
490 |
| |
|
India, NPCIL |
Kaiga 5 6 |
PHWR |
490 |
dates
according to latest announcements
Sources:UIC/WNA information papers
news reports
Nuclear Engineering International,
handbook
|